Old Plywood Mills Don’t Always Fade Away

Old Plywood Mills Don’t Always Fade Away

Old Plywood Mills Don’t Always Fade Away

Article by Rich Donnell, Editor-in-Chief, Panel World January 2011

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is an edited excerpt from the publication entitled “From Penply To K Ply,” one of a series of monographs produced by the Plywood Pioneers Assn. It complements this issue’s cover story.

They came from mill towns across western Washington and Oregon—the seasoned plywood production men who founded Peninsula Plywood Corp. in 1941. PenPly began as an idea in the minds of two Hoquiam, Wash. men, Oscar Groth and Carl Stromberg. Working together in the machine shop of the Polson Logging Company near Hoquiam, they discussed the success of worker-owned plywood mills such as Olympia Veneer. They looked throughout western Washington and western Oregon for a suitable manufacturing site “near a supply of peeler logs.” Port Angeles was one of the first locations considered.

Early in 1941, a team drawn from potential shareholders made a three-week tour of Northwest communities to promote the idea of a new mill. The team included Emory Moore, a salesman who agreed to serve as PenPly’s president during the construction phase and who later was to rise to national leadership in the plywood industry; Loren Haugen, who was to become the corporation’s chief engineer, and who in later years was to head up his own mills in Roseburg and Medford, Ore.; Carl Jacobson, who was to serve as vice president, then production superintendent, and in later years become a principal of Southern Oregon Plywood, Grants Pass, Ore.; and Herman Halvarson, who was to be the first treasurer.

On April 13, 1941, Peninsula Plywood Corporation was formally organized in Longview, Wash. The corporation was registered with the state of Washington in papers showing $500,000 capital on the basis of 350 shares of common stock at $1,000 per share and 1,500 shares of preferred stock at $100 par value per share. Each of the common shareholders was to have one vote in the organization, work at an equal wage, and receive income from a wage scale that could fluctuate according to market ups and downs.

From the beginning, PenPly called itself a “semi-cooperative.” Although 350 shares of common stock were authorized, only 285 shares were issued as there were to be only 285 jobs available at startup. The initial wage was $1.25 per hour, of which 25 cents was withheld and applied to mill capital.

The Port Angeles Evening News estimated that 75% of PenPly’s original stockholders were Scandinavian born or of Scandinavian descent. The majority of the worker owners at PenPly had extensive previous plywood manufacturing experience in Washington and Oregon.

The late Clarence Flatau recalled the huge challenge faced by the ordinary working man in raising the $1,000 needed to buy a share in 1941. Interviewed in 1971, Flatau described making an initial deposit of just $5 to treasurer Halvarson, who accepted it with obvious confidence that Flatau would soon come up with the rest of the money. He did this by selling his car and borrowing the rest.

For Flatau and many others, that hard-won investment would eventually prove to be worth far more than any of the pioneer shareholders could have imagined. A PenPly working share of $1,000 in 1941 grew to be worth $300,000 in 1971, counting job income and appreciation in share value.

 

Latest News

Canfor’s Vida Group Buys Sweden Mills

Canfor Corp. executives announced in mid June that Canfor’s 70%-owned subsidiary, Vida Group, has entered into an agreement to purchase three sawmills located in Sweden from Bergs Timber for $43 million (Can.), plus working capital…

Indonesia To Keep Export License System

Backing off an earlier announcement that Indonesian wood products exporters would no longer need to obtain a license showing the wood’s origin and legality, Indonesia’s Ministry of Trade recently reversed itself after an outcry…

Next Xylexpo To Be Held In 2022

The Board of Cepra-Centro promozionale Acimall, orgaziners of Xylexpo, speaking through its president Lorenzo Primultini, officially canceled the 2020 show on July 6, 2020. Initially scheduled for late May in Milan, Italy, Xylexpo was first…

Find Us On Social

Newsletter

The monthly Panel World Industry Newsletter reaches over 3,000 who represent primary panel production operations.

Subscribe/Renew

Panel World is delivered six times per year to North American and international professionals, who represent primary panel production operations. Subscriptions are FREE to qualified individuals.

Advertise

Complete the online form so we can direct you to the appropriate Sales Representative. Contact us today!

BCAP, Formaldehyde Among Top Issues In ’10

BCAP, Formaldehyde Among Top Issues In ’10

Story by Rich Donnell,
Editor-in-Chief

Panel World magazine, as you may have realized, is published every other month. So its last issue of the year, such as the one in your hand, carries a November dateline; but in reality this issue is put to bed in late September, so when I say let’s review the past year, as I am now saying, I’m referring to late September 2009 to late September 2010.
I will say this, as bad as things have been, that late September 2009 and late September 2010 went a lot smoother than, say, late September 2008. You remember late September 2008 don’t you? The general economy was in a nosedive. Lehman Brothers had just filed for bankruptcy apparently because it couldn’t manage its subprime mortgage holdings. The stock market was collapsing. The building industry, which was already ill, went into a coma.
Since then, through late September 2009 and late September 2010, the building industry has emerged from its coma, though at times it still has difficulty recognizing some of the people in the room, and when it chooses to speak, its words aren’t always intelligible. It still has a lot more bad days than good days.
Here’s what happened during some of those days in the past year:

  • A new business, Peninsula Plywood, decided to start operating the softwood plywood plant in Port Angeles, Wash., which had started up in 1941 under the name, Peninsula Plywood.
  • Composite Panel Assn. took the position that the federal government’s Biomass Crop Assistance Program for renewable energy projects was an unfair subsidy program that could have disastrous consequences on wood-based industries.
  • Murphy Co. geared up the idled Panel Products plywood plant in Rogue River, Ore.
  • Arauco purchased Tafisa.
  • Panel World magazine celebrated its 50th anniversary.
  • Georgia-Pacific acquired the OSB facilities of Grant Forest Products.
  • Duraflake started up a melamine lamination facility in Albany, Oregon, and celebrated 50 years of operation there.
  • Uniboard produced its first MDF panel at its $160 million plant in Moncure, NC, part of which was moved from La Baie, Quebec and refurbished.
  • The second Panel & Engineered Lumber International Conference & Expo was held in Atlanta, Georgia, featuring such excellent speakers as OSB industry entrepreneur John Godfrey.
  • A bump up in markets during the early part of the year didn’t fool anybody that the recovery had truly begun.
  • Composite Panel Assn. celebrated its 50th year, since its formation as National Particleboard Assn. in 1960.
  • Long-time plywood equipment manufacturing specialist Dick Kerns died at age 74.
  • EPA’s proposed Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology rules didn’t sit well with companies still immersed in a recession.
  • The federal government passed into law a national formaldehyde standards act for board emissions that, while extremely strict, should level the playing field with regard to quality control, testing and enforcement.
  • As reported in this issue, Momentive Performance Materials and Hexion merged to form a $7.5 billion resins giant.
  • As also noted in this issue, our friend and former columnist, Professor Al Moslemi, died at age 74.
If The Stock Market Has Crashed, Don’t Read This Part 2

If The Stock Market Has Crashed, Don’t Read This Part 2

Story by Rich Donnell,
Editor-in-Chief

I don’t know why I continue to do this, but several times each day I find myself going to marketwatch.com and getting the latest news on finances and stocks. As if I was a major player. True, I am a player in a major stock, Apple. But I am minor league material.

However, because I invested in Apple in late spring 2009, when it was 134, and today it stands at (wait, let me go to marketwatch.com) just above 255, it’s easy to fool myself into thinking I know what I’m doing.
But I have a secret to tell. It was my wife who first got us into Apple at 134. At about 150, I said let’s triple up. Along the way, as I mentioned in this space about a year ago, when Apple was a mere 190, we pulled some profits and bought—what else?—two Apple MacBooks.

But now we’re thinking big with Apple, as in using the profits to pay for my daughter’s wedding, though my daughter isn’t even engaged and is concentrating more on graduating in pre-med from the University of the South—Sewanee next year than planning a wedding (though a serious boyfriend lurks).
Perhaps by the wedding, whenever that is, Apple will hover near 400, as one “expert” has forecasted. Jeepers, that’s almost Googlesque. If that happens, we might have enough Apple profits to pay not only for our daughter’s wedding, but for all her school tuition loans.

You see, a lot rides on Apple in our family. Which is why recently I suffered great anxiety when Consumer Reports said Apple’s new iPhone 4 experiences reception issues when you hold the phone a certain way with your bare hand. I didn’t even know what an iPhone was, other than that Apple introduced it, which immediately made it significant in my daughter’s future wedding plans. The stock nosedived for several days, maybe down to 235 even, and I had visions of my daughter eloping, until Apple chief Steve Jobs made a special appearance to address the issue, and advised users to hold the phone a different way.

Whew! That was close. But the crisis was quelled, and since then Apple has been on the rise again.
So I guess in essence I go to marketwatch.com each day to see how my daughter’s future wedding plans are progressing as well as the payments on her loans.

One thing I have learned in making these daily visits to marketwatch.com is that there’s a good chance the market will react in just the opposite of what the main headline says. That is, when the headline and story is negative (“Oil Spill Darkens Sentiment”), the market turns positive, and when the headline and story is positive (“Oil Spill Stoppage Brightens Sentiment”), the market goes negative. I wasn’t going to reveal this investment insight, but I like you guys.

Of course I’m wondering what the Oil Spill has to do with investing in stocks anyway. I have another secret to reveal. The reason I tripled our investment in Apple was because Apple was also the name of the Beatles’ record company, and I’ve always been a big Beatles fan. Sometimes it pays off to tie up loose ends.

How To Cap BCAP Costs

How To Cap BCAP Costs

Story by Dan Shell,
Managing Editor

Back in early 2008, I remember first hearing about some type of new federal pilot program with matching payments for collecting and hauling biomass that would start with around $20 million bucks. Now, $20 million isn’t so much in the overall context of federal spending these days—call it the equivalent of a stock trader’s cup of coffee considering the trillions thrown at the investment banking sector, or a couple hours of war. I also remember thinking that $20 million for biomass shipments would disappear pretty quick.

Flash forward two years, and the Biomass Crop Assistance Program has exploded, with costs projected at $2.1 billion over the next 10 years. Until it was temporarily suspended in February because of its controversial impact on existing biomass and mill residual markets and lack of progress towards the goal of developing new sources of renewable fuels, more than $185 million in payments had been made in little more than 6 months—with another $100-plus million authorized and currently being processed.

So much for that cute little $20 million “pilot program.”

Previous issues of this magazine as well as this one have contained much coverage and background on the panel industry’s response to the Dept. of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency soliciting public comments and modifying BCAP to better focus its efforts on developing and utilizing new sources of biomass, not disrupting existing markets and raising residual costs. A new and improved BCAP is due to resume later this year. Outside of that technical rule-making effort is the federal budget appropriations process to fund BCAP as part of the 2012 Farm Bill that’s currently gaining weight in Congress.

Even in a Congress that spends money like it’s burning a hole in the U.S. Treasury, it hasn’t gone unnoticed that BCAP is poised to become a giant agricultural subsidy. During recent Congressional hearings on BCAP, one appropriations committee member noted BCAP costs have risen 3,000% faster than original budget projections.

A new reason for the pending BCAP cost explosion is a provision added to the proposed “new and improved” BCAP: In addition to providing matching payments for collecting, storing and hauling biomass, the government will now pay biomass growers up to 75% of their “crop establishment” costs. That sound you hear is the subsidy door being blown wide open and off its hinges once BCAP gains traction as a row-crop subsidy.

Congressman Jack Kingston of Georgia said at a recent hearing, “If we don’t kill it now, it will have its own lobbying group. It has a constituency growing.”

While there are plenty of ways for government to get involved and help develop various incentives for alternative energy utilization, is having the federal government inject raw cash payments into developing markets the right way to go? Or will that just produce distortions in economic activity that’s occurring anyway?

USDA Farm Service Agency Administrator Jonathan Coppess says the the final BCAP rule will “unleash the full potential of the BCAP program.”

Yet seeing BCAP “unleashed” is exactly what many in the panel industry are worried about.

You’ll Find A Mill In Moncure

You’ll Find A Mill In Moncure

You’ll Find A Mill In Moncure

 

Article by Rich Donnell, Editor-in-Chief, Panel World May 2010

You’ve probably already noticed on the cover of this issue, and you’ll notice beginning on page 10 in this issue that Uniboard’s new MDF/ HDF plant in Moncure, North Carolina is in the spotlight.

To begin with, if you’re driving from, say, Atlanta, or farther up the interstate at Charlotte, it’s not easy to get to Moncure. I mean you can take the interstate up and around to Raleigh and then backtrack southwest to Moncure, but that’s no fun. Which means, you’ll be taking the highways near or through the likes of Concord and Asheboro, and Siler City and dipping down to Sanford before shooting back up to Moncure, and which also means you might be calling your mill appointment in Moncure and asking for another 30 minutes because it seems like you’ve been running in place.

Actually it’s a nice drive; the kind of drive that allows you to gather your thoughts. Some of my thoughts concerned the Moncure mill property, where Uniboard has built its new MDF plant and on which Uniboard also operates a particleboard plant and melamine laminating operation.

I was thinking about the site’s different owners through the years. But I was mistaken on my premise that Weyerhaeuser had been the original owner. Tom Ruedy, the Uniboard Director of Business Development of Moncure MDF & HDF, quickly set me straight when I finally reached the plant.

Evans Products had started up an MDF plant here in 1971, Ruedy told me. Then Weyerhaeuser bought it in 1974. Ruedy, after graduating from Virginia Tech, had gone to work for Weyerhaeuser at its corporate headquarters in Tacoma, before Weyerhaeuser sent him to Moncure in 1978 as a quality control guy, and he hasn’t strayed too far since. Weyerhaeuser owned the operations until 1999, and I say “operations” because Weyerhaeuser started up a new particleboard plant in 1987. In 1999, Weyerhaeuser sold its Moncure operations to SierraPine. SierraPine stayed around until most of 2004, when it sold to ATC Panels. Then Uniboard bought the complex, which included a melamine laminating operation in addition to the particleboard plant, and the inoperable remnants of the old MDF plant.

Something that caught my eye as I was driving into the area was the Moncure Plywood mill just down the road. A little research revealed that it started up more than 40 years ago as Triangle Plywood, then became Boise Cascade, then Williamette Industries, then Weyerhaeuser Co., and in 2004 became Wood Resources LLC of Atlas Holdings. It had been through a labor strike through parts of 2008-2009. It was still operating when I drove by it.

I don’t know of what value any of this information is to you. I do know that as I departed Moncure, my thoughts steered toward the people who had worked on these grounds through the years—their skills, their ambitions, their families. I also thought about all the new technologies that had been implemented and replaced with newer technologies, right up to Uniboard’s new plant.

I guess some old mill sites never die, they don’t even fade away (especially if the regional timber resource remains viable and accessible). At least that appears to be the case in Moncure, North Carolina.

 

Latest News

Find Us On Social

Newsletter

The monthly Panel World Industry Newsletter reaches over 3,000 who represent primary panel production operations.

Subscribe/Renew

Panel World is delivered six times per year to North American and international professionals, who represent primary panel production operations. Subscriptions are FREE to qualified individuals.

Advertise

Complete the online form so we can direct you to the appropriate Sales Representative. Contact us today!